Investment Chat Board Lawsuits Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SI Dave who wrote (12289)	12/5/2019 9:36:12 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) of 12465

These are all examples of exercising a publisher's editorial discretion, which is specifically immunized from liability and lawsuit by Section 230, by specific design and intent. That's 180 degrees out... the opposite of the truth in what the law AS PASSED intends... as that's NOT what it says... The law, on its face, does not insulate anyone from liability for being a publisher... It insulates them from liability for being NOT a publisher... and you can't have it both ways... to have the immunity for being NOT a publisher... while being a publisher... And that's the problem... EXACTLY as I've been saying... because it has the law doing the EXACT OPPOSITE of what we WANT... and WE... and not the media companies seeking to justify their imposition of censorship... are what matters. That they've been lying about the law... just like backpage was lying about not sex trafficking children... is the exact same pattern, too... So, no... not settled law... That's law that needs to be burned to the ground...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next