Investment Chat Board Lawsuits Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: StockDung who wrote (1238)	3/12/2001 5:52:41 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	of 12465

Supposing the Nevada judge had found he did have jurisdiction over me. I'd have had to either muddle through a long drawn out battle pro se, hired a lawyer and spent big bucks, or just caved and apologized to avoid the other two. Knowing me I'd fight it. But suppose I won. Then what? I'd still have to sue for malicious prosecution just to get back my legal expenses. AZNT/Sylver have no money to give so I'd probably have to eat the legal fees a second time. Thank goodness it didn't come to that. Thank goodness the SEC investigated AZNT and is now prosecuting them for securities fraud. Many people here are not that lucky. When you consider that many states don't have anti-SLAPP legislation or have even turned it down you just have to gag. - Jeff

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next