SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill7/11/2005 12:46:47 PM
   of 793928
 
I'm Glad It's Not Just Me
Just one minute blog
The NY Times pries into the Valerie Plame leak investigation and baffles us. But we are not alone!

From Mark Kleiman, who has been following this forever:

Clear as mud

Adam Liptak has a blow-by-blow of the Cooper/Rove negotations and related matters that leaves me more confused than I was before.

And Kevin Drum:

This story is so weird that I'm not even going to try to summarize it, but apparently the answer is murkier than we've been led to believe.

The WaPo adds little to the fray, although I would exhort Mr. Luskin, Karl Rove's attorney, to end the drip, drip, drip and just tell us whatever he is trying to tell us - a disclosure a day keeps the story in play.

The WSJ also tackles this, chats with Luskin, and summarizes the "personal waiver" saga thuly:

Yesterday, Mr. Luskin explained that Mr. Rove, like other White House officials, had signed a document provided by Mr. Fitzgerald in December 2003, allowing reporters to testify about conversations with him. On Wednesday, before Mr. Cooper was headed to court and a possible jail term, his attorney, Richard Sauber, called Mr. Luskin and asked for reassurance that the earlier waiver encompassed Mr. Rove's discussions with Mr. Cooper. If so, Mr. Sauber sought more express consent. Mr. Luskin checked with Mr. Fitzgerald as to whether more specific consent was necessary, and then gave that consent to Mr. Cooper, who said last week that he received the permission in "somewhat dramatic fashion."

It does appear that Mr. Cooper eventually accepted the same general waiver that Ms. Miller is rejecting. The Times also fails to confirm the WaPo reporting from last fall in which they suggested that she had been subpoenaed to testify about Lewis Libby.

Flashing back to the Times, they provide an interesting snippet on Matt Cooper:

Mr. Cooper was not an obvious vehicle for a sensitive leak. He had become one of the magazine's White House correspondents only the month before the conversation and is married to a prominent Democratic strategist, Mandy Grunwald.

Getting closer! What the Times left out is that Ms. Grunwald is a daughter of Henry Grunwald, one of Time magazine's most distinguished editors. One might have thought that a son-in-law could have exerted a bit more clout if he had really wanted to cling to his notes.
justoneminute.typepad.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext