Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (124568)	7/11/2005 12:55:45 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 793896

I agree with that 100%. But sometimes historians have to deal in hypotheticals so i will pose the question to you. Knowing what you know now about wmds, the insurgency, policy changes in libya,syria out of lebanor, the wot etc etc. and if you could time travel and if you were made President,(and the WH was moved to Hawaii to accomodadate you) would you have still gone into iraq? For me this is no easy question at all. I think the serious opponents to the war as opposed to the wild eyed leftys, would make a strong case to have concentrated on al quaeda, while using failing containment on iraq to buy some time and concentrating more fully on Iran and NK. One of the reasons i think we really went into iraq is that we viewed it then as low hanging fruit which it certainly turned out not to be. Mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next