Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jttmab who wrote (124626)	2/12/2004 1:14:41 AM
From: Hawkmoon	of 281500

To make that statement there must be something measurable that establishes that one party or another has been aggressive in restricting operations. Is there any data that supports your statement? Well, that's what the intelligence committee and various pundits are telling us.. (as well as my own personal sources which you probably won't accept). And we just finished with 8 years of democratic rule, which resulted in 40% budget cuts at DOD (and in their intelligence operations). talkingpointsmemo.com "On September 23rd, 2001, Novak discussed the long decline of the CIA, particularly its human intelligence (HUMINT) and operational capacities. He made particular reference to the tenure of Stansfield Turner as DCI. Thus Novak: “Appalled by the CIA's operatives in Central America, he issued the now-famous order against hiring unsavory local agents. There went any serious effort at espionage.” Again, that ain’t a reference to analysts." And here's an excellent read on the topic: fas.org Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next