Oswald worked for a coffee company for a short time, then he was fired. He was a typical incompetent leftwing loser.
the entire Jim Garrison case was about was a publicity stunt:
"During the trial, Russo told a story of an "assassination party" in which Shaw, David Ferrie, and Oswald discussed killing Kennedy. Perry’s version of events have been questioned by historians and researchers, such as Patricia Lambert, once it became known that much of his testimony was induced by hypnotism, and drugs such as Sodium Pentothal.[1]
At the trial, Russo gave the full alleged "hypnosis" version of his testimony, with Ferrie, and "Oswald", and "Clay Bertrand" (who Russo identified in the courtroom as Clay Shaw) talking about killing the President. The conversation included plans for the Dealey Plaza shooting ("triangulation of crossfire") and for alibis for all the participants.
However, a memo detailing a pre-hypnosis interview with Russo in Baton Rouge, and the two hypnosis session transcripts had been given to journalist James Phelan by Garrison. There were striking differences between the two accounts.[2] Both Russo and Sciambra testified under cross examination that much more was said at the interview, but omitted from the memorandum. However, James Phelan testified that Russo had admitted to him in March 1967 that the February 25 memorandum of the interview, which contained no recollection of an assassination party, was accurate.
Police officer Aloysius J. Habighorst (who fingerprinted Shaw following his arrest) gave evidence that Shaw admitted — when asked — that he had used the name Clay Bertrand as an alias. This was on the fingerprint card, along with Shaw's signature. Shaw contended that he had never admitted the alias to Habighorst, and also claimed that he had signed the fingerprint card while it was still blank.[2]
Officer Habighorst's testimony and the fingerprint card were deemed inadmissible as evidence as the judge concluded that any such questioning - during the booking — constituted a violation of both Miranda v. Arizona and Escobedo v. Illinois. The judge went on to say that he believed Habighorst's testimony was a fabrication and doubted that the incident even took place — stating in court that, "I do not believe Officer Habighorst." [3]
Notwithstanding the credibility issues of Russo, Garrison's case also included unreliable witnesses such as Charles Spiesel, who believed he had been repeatedly hypnotized by government forces.[4] The jury took less than one hour to find Shaw not guilty."
en.wikipedia.org
Oswald killed Kennedy because Kennedy was an anticommunist cold warrior. Leftists can't that one of their own killed Kennedy so they created a vasy myth, just as they are now doing with 911. |
