SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (124866)7/12/2005 6:10:14 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 793914
 
He then proposes three concrete steps

1) Which will only hold up in court if applied even-handedly to all religious institutions, not just mosques.

2) Which will only hold up in court if not used to limit free speech -- advocating criminal acts is subject to the "clear and present danger" test -- is there a clear and present danger that a crime will be committed as a result of the advocacy?

It's already illegal to advocate criminal acts if there is a clear and present danger that they will be committed. If not, it's not illegal and can't be made illegal without violating the First Amendment.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News