SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis- Indicators & Systems

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Chandler H. Everett who wrote (1249)6/1/1997 2:45:00 PM
From: TechTrader42   of 3325
 
Thank you for your formula for the width of the bands, which shortens mine considerably. I haven't been able to come up with a good formula to gauge the width relative to the width over the stock's history. I'll take a look at what you did with StochRSI.

As I said, I tried these:

(mov((fml("Bollinger Band Upper")-fml("Bollinger Band Lower")),89,s)-.5)>(mov((fml("Bollinger Band Upper")-fml("Bollinger Band Lower")),200,s))

((fml("Bollinger Band Upper"))-(fml("Bollinger Band Lower"))>3.8)

mov((fml("Bollinger Band Upper")-fml("Bollinger Band Lower")),220,s)>(mov((fml("Bollinger Band Upper")-fml("Bollinger Band Lower")),520,s))

All are flawed (and could be shortened with your formula for the width of the bands). The problem is that if the moving averages are too short, you get buy and sell signals in periods of little volatility. If you make them too long, you cancel a lot of good signals. If you set a numerical value, it doesn't work for all stocks. The bands' width varies too much, depending on the price of the stocks.

The best gauge, of course, is the naked eye, but you can't work this into a profit testing system (not one that wasn't grisly, at least).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext