SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JEFF CHAPMAN who wrote ()11/2/1998 6:20:00 AM
From: Westergaard   of 1267
 
In response this morning to a poster commenting he would have expected Premier to be "long gone" by now, I stated as follows on the PLSIA thread:

You are correct, Sir. Had Premier not a viable product line, it
would be long gone by now. But the fact is it does. In my 40 years
experience as a security analyst, I have been down this road
dozens of times -- companies that get in trouble for any one of many reasons but that eventually make it very simply because THEY
HAVE GOOD PRODUCTS. As for your friend Pluvia, I posted the
following on another thread this morning in response to a posting by a soulmate of Pluvia's stating that Premier stock had been delisted:

Premier was not "delisted" as you state. Trading was suspended for
reasons having nothing to do with Pluvia's misrepresentations
about the company. The suspension related to the resignation of
Premier's auditors and therefore its inability to file financials
until new accountants were engaged. That's what it was about. Once
financials were filed, the suspension was lifted.

Pluvia's ridiculous personal attacks on me are childish. Yes I am
overweight at 225 when I ought to be 190. I do intend to address
that problem seriously next year. I do not drink other than a
couple of glasses of wine when I'm out for dinner. For background
on the brouhaha between me and Pluvia, check
wbn.com:8080/Generalinfo/rules.html

Keep in mind that in attacking Premier in the summer of 1997,
Pluvia's motives were revealed to be those of a distributor of a
competitive product attempting to knock the products of Premier.
Pluvia was representing himself falsely as an investor. That's
fraud in my book.

"Humbly"..... John Westergaard
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News