SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : BYD Co. LTD (BYDDY, BYDDF)
BYDDY 13.51-0.2%3:59 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Savant5/28/2025 4:09:34 PM
2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Johnny Canuck
Selectric II

   of 141
 
Overcapacity Sinks BYD as China Dumps EVs, Tesla Aims for RoboTaxi Riches

(Analysis) In a seismic shift for the electric vehicle (EV) industry, Chinese automaker BYD’s shares recently plummeted 8% after slashing prices by up to 20% across 22 models, signaling a desperate bid to clear bloated inventories amid fierce competition and overcapacity in China’s EV market.
This move, reported by CNBC, underscores the precarious balance of China’s heavily subsidized EV sector, which now faces a reckoning as it floods global markets with cheap vehicles.
Meanwhile, Tesla, though not immune to the price war, is poised to sidestep the carnage by pivoting toward autonomous driving and robotics, with EBITDA forecasts projecting massive profits from 2028 onward.
This tale of two giants reveals the fragility of China’s EV dominance and Tesla’s audacious bet on a future beyond traditional carmaking.
China’s EV boom, fueled by aggressive government subsidies, has created a double-edged sword.

Subsidies, covering up to 25% of BYD’s profits, have enabled companies like BYD and Xiaomi to produce affordable, technologically advanced EVs at scale, outpacing global rivals.

These incentives, part of China’s industrial policy to dominate strategic sectors like EVs, AI, and biotechnology, have lowered financial risks for startups, attracting investment and fostering innovation.
The result? China’s EV penetration nears 50%, dwarfing the U.S.’s 10%. But this success has bred overcapacity, with BYD’s dealer inventory swelling by 150,000 units in early 2025, equivalent to half a month’s sales.
To clear this glut, BYD slashed prices, with models like the Seagull dropping to $7,780, triggering fears of a margin-crushing price war.
Overcapacity Sinks BYD as China Dumps EVs, Tesla Aims for RoboTaxi Riches
The 8% share drop reflects investor panic over shrinking profitability, as competitors like Geely, Xpeng, and Nio also saw declines of 4-9%.
China’s strategy now hinges on exporting this surplus to Europe and beyond. BYD, which outsold Tesla in Europe for the first time in April 2025, is leveraging new factories in Hungary and Turkey to skirt EU tariffs of up to 45.3%.
Yet, this aggressive expansion risks destabilizing global markets. By flooding Europe with sub-$10,000 EVs equipped with advanced features like BYD’s “God’s Eye” driver-assistance system, China threatens to decimate local automakers like Volkswagen and Stellantis.
The U.S., with potentially high tariffs, remains a tougher nut to crack, but BYD’s focus on Southeast Asia and South America shows its global ambitions.
However, this dumping strategy may backfire. Subsidies have bred structurally unprofitable companies reliant on government largesse.
The projected profits for Tesla, shown in red for Full Self-Driving (FSD) and orange for Optimus, are set to dominate, while core EV profits, in blue, are increasingly marginal.
The projected profits for Tesla, shown in red for Full Self-Driving (FSD) and orange for Optimus, are set to dominate, while core EV profits, in blue, are increasingly marginal.
If subsidies wane, as they inevitably must, China’s EV sector could implode, leaving a market where no one—not even BYD—can sustain margins.
Tesla, by contrast, is charting a radically different course. While it faces pressure in China, where its market share dipped to 2.6% in 2024, Tesla’s long-term strategy hinges on Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Optimus, its humanoid robot.
Analysts project Tesla’s EBITDA to skyrocket from 2028, driven by these high-margin ventures. Unlike traditional EVs, which yield $7,000 per vehicle, a RoboTaxi could generate $50,000-$60,000 annually in margins, transforming Tesla into a mobility and AI platform.
Optimus, though further out, promises even greater returns, potentially in the trillions by the 2030s. Energy storage, expected to surpass automotive revenue by 2027, adds another layer of resilience.
This pivot, spearheaded by Elon Musk’s 2024 decision to scrap a $25,000 EV, reflects a prescient recognition that the EV market is hurtling toward commoditization.
By betting on autonomy, Tesla aims to escape the “margin shit show” predicted to engulf the industry by 2028, when overcapacity and price wars could wipe out traditional carmakers.
The implications are stark. China’s EV juggernaut, while formidable, is built on shaky foundations, risking a self-inflicted wound as subsidies foster overproduction.
BYD’s price cuts may boost sales temporarily—Citi estimates a 30-40% surge—but they erode profitability and signal deeper structural flaws.
Tesla, though not invincible, is uniquely positioned to weather the storm, leveraging its software and AI prowess to redefine mobility.
As China’s EVs flood global markets, the fallout will ripple through Europe, Japan, and beyond, potentially triggering a political and economic reckoning.
By 2030, while BYD grapples with a saturated, low-margin market, Tesla’s autonomous gamble could propel it to unprecedented heights, proving that in the EV race, the winner isn’t the cheapest, but the smartest.

Overcapacity Sinks BYD as China Dumps EVs, Tesla Aims for RoboTaxi Riches - The Rio Times
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext