SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (128582)10/10/2001 7:53:55 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (2) of 436258
 
Jim, i think it can be seen in a similar light as previous booms...while there's now a lot of unused capacity, it has certainly been a bonanza for the consumer, in terms of getting a lot of communication power for very little money. and there's always the hope that at some point in the future a killer application might come along and revive demand. but what is definitely out of the question are the riches the snake-oil sellers promised would be reaped by the corporations involved in the build-out. on the whole, it has been a money-losing proposition. consider that the accumulated losses of Nasdaq listed firms since mid 2000 now exceed the cumulative net profits of the years '95 to '00.
i for one am not surprised, as a great deal of the reported profits was derived from the stock market itself. everything from ESOPs (and the related tax credits) to put selling and speculation in other cos. stocks was practiced with great fervor...remember when Intel insisted that analysts include its market speculation profits in their earnings estimates? now that the profits have turned to losses, Intel is remarkably quiet on the issue.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext