Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (128935)	4/4/2012 1:25:07 PM
From: TideGlider	3 Recommendations of 224748

Yes of course of the law is presumed constitutional, however, this one was challenged and reversed in Appeals Court and under review by the Supreme Court. It was the SGs job to support the law and it is the governments burden of proof. You are incorrect as usual. Kennedy was right and perhaps that proves you are a knucklehead. The Supreme Court allowed both sides to make their argument. The states apparently made a convincing argument and Justice Kennedy commented that changing the relationship between the federal government and the people would be a significant burden to overcome. He was right. It is a very difficult argument to overcome..

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next