Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Petz who wrote (129079)	11/27/2000 6:57:49 AM
From: hmaly	of 1580155

John Re...harry, I'd bet the Realworldtech article is more up-to-date, so that the P4 ramp is only modestly faster than originally intended.<<< John, I have no doubt Deans article is based upon more recent info. What strikes me as odd is that Dean's article was written only 3 days after the P4 intro, and Intel already knew it had a dog on its hand. Why all of the " we are going to double our ramp speed" and "the P4 will have the faster ramp in history" BS. One wk. Intel is doubling the ramp and the next Intel is slowing it down. This kind of stuff tells me Craig doesn't have a clue about what he is doing. Imagine what all of the big investors think of this; when you have bet a big chunk of money on that fast ramp. And what about all of the analysts who claimed that the P4 was crucial to Intels future. What is the difference between Amd in 1998 and Intel in 2000; and does Intel really want that kind of reputation.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next