SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ASCEND 1997 : The reasons why it will descend.
ASND 213.290.0%Jan 2 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skipper who wrote (6)1/16/1997 4:20:00 AM
From: LEUTHY   of 122
 
Skeeper and Dee Jay

Skeeper

I made two style mistakes in my post. I tried to correct it by re editing my message. But as my post is quite long, it took some time to reload, reedit and repost. And the modification was not done. I don't think it is possible to correct after 15 minutes. If it is, tell
me how to do and I will correct it immediately.

However, I think that the mistake you mentionned about the separation between the SEC comments and my comments brings no confusion since the Caracter font changes from italic to standard, the style changes, and so on...

This is a first personnal argument (in bold)

Abstract from ....


" jljjkjkljkjklj
lklmklmdsklfjdklsfjklsdfljsdklfjkdlsfjklsjf
fsdfsdlfmsdfldlfm—sdlfsldfmlsdmfm—sdlfmsdfmsd—fm—l
—flsdmflmsdmfldslf—sd (I forget the final quote but at the end)


Now the font changes

This is the second argument (in bold)

dsdsdkskdkqsdkdqqmslkdmqlsk.

Did you really make the confusion, and thought that the second argument was in the abstract? If you did, I apologise.


Otherwise, the second mistake can bring some confusion. The quote is there, but I forgot changing the font. OK. Data Communications gives Market datas.
I gave my personal point of view about future sales of MAX. Again if it is possible to correct, I'll do it.

Now, let's stop talking about my bad intentions. I worked quite a lot of time to write this synthesis, and hope it will be useful, even if your conclusion is not the same as mine.

Dee Jay : You wrote

" Thursday after the close the results will be issued and I expect that Messrs. Leuthy & Rapport will have some egg on their collective faces (face?)."

I am an engineer and don't manage a restaurant. Otherwise, I will perhaps appreciate getting some eggs.

Adam rapport and I are two differents persons that don't even know each other. Are you an open minded person ? If so, you should consider that at least two different persons could have a different opinion than yours.

Beeing more accurate : I starded my research after reading some of Adam rapport posts on Ascend forum.

I didn't tell that 4 Qtr Numbers will be bad. Just that, in my opinion, 1997 will be a difficult year and should have some influence on stock price.

When I started this forum, I suspected that it could bring some agressivity, insults ... But I decided to start it because I think that such a point of view has to be expressed, and that the discussion it will bring could be useful for everyone.

The last point I wanted to mention : If you think that I am trying to influence the stock price in order to win some bucks, you are wrong.

Institutions and mutual Funds holds about 80 % of ASCEND's shares They have their own analysts that probably don't care about SI posts.

Except in case of a general Downtrend of Wall Street, ASND price will change significantly only if the big shareholders decide when it has to happen and where the price has to be.

Private Individual investors don't write the rules of this game.

So, probably 90 % of ASCEND's followers believe that the company will continue to perform well. I belong to the the minority but I want to express my opinion.

This forum has one goal : To say to individual investors : Be careful with this stock. That's all.

Please, No more agressivity.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext