Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (130181)	8/6/2005 3:29:35 PM
From: Constant Reader	of 793853

If we're going to cut the federal government back to strictly authorized ones ON PRINCIPLE, I'm fine with that. But I think issue by issue reduction based on the strength of the interest group would be a real mess. There are lots of people with really strong beliefs about all sorts of issues. Every PC issue imaginable, for starters. If they see it as a successful strategy, there will be lots of comers, a lot more polarization, and their issues would have to be sorted out one at a time. We really don't need that. Hear! Hear! or is it Here! Here? And does it apply to a situation where the comment is written and not spoken? Suffice to say that I wholeheartedly agree with that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next