James W. is not very smart - he can't even read a phone book.
Creative and original response, too - where have we seen this before? Hmm, last year James W. tried to convince us that Wayne O'Connor and I were in fact the same person. So be it. But the INTERNET attracts many such borderline personalities where one can assume characteristics of choice. In the case of of our furry little friend, it is not sufficient to dabble on other delicious threads, he is compelled to share his intuitive comments about the Band Ore story here, although he has neither a long position, nor the capacity to demonstrate that he did in fact short the stock as he claimed. This then is antagonism, pure and simple.
Again, do call the company for yourselves. Review the volume of posts by our little tumour during the decline in the market and then ponder the motives. The INTERNET has one other great failing in that it is like a family gathering at Christmas. James W. is the big, fat, fouls-smelling, ugly uncle that no one likes or wants, but keeps showing up anyway cuz he drinks the free beer.
FWIW, I received most of my shares by way of vendings from properties, as disclosed here several times in the past. Lost profits are not necessarily the same as "losses", but then James W. is not very smart.
FWIW-2, track the share price - this is what it is really all about, n'est-ce pas? Go ahead James W., buy Royal Oak.
GJM the prospector |
