SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (12956)8/13/2005 7:16:16 AM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Who’s side is the The Guardian on?

Guradian Has A Terrorist Contributor

By Rob on International Scene
Say Anything

We all laughed when The Guardian re-printed the text of one of Osama bin Laden’s speeches in the form of an opinion column. Some of us were a bit worried when it came to light that the paper had an anti-semitic terror-sympathizer on its writing staff.

Now The Guardian has a column up by a man named Saad al-Fagih. Who is Saad? According to The Guardian he “is a leading exiled Saudi dissident and director of the Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia.”

He is, in reality, more “terrorist” than “dissident.”
    Al-Faiqih seems to have bought the satellite phone which 
    was used by one of the Al Qaeda suicide bombers who blew 
    up the US embassy in Nairobi.
    Sa’ad al-Faqih, was “designated” by the United States 
    Treasury on December 21, 2004 and on 23 Dec 2004 was 
    named on the United Nations 1267 Committee consolidated 
    list of individuals belonging to or associated with the 
    Al-Qaida organisation. 
    On 14 July 2005, the US Treasury “designated” al-
    Faiqih’s “Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia” (MIRA), 
    a U.K.-based Saudi oppositionist organization, for 
    providing material support to al Qaida:
There’s more, so read the whole thing.
hurryupharry.bloghouse.net

Given this situation along with the previous two I’ve mentioned (in addition to others I’m probably forgetting about) the only question that I feel needs to be asked is: Who’s side is the The Guardian on? After three instances like those above one can no longer reasonably attribute the decisions to poor judgment.

Personally, I can’t help but feel that The Guardian is making a concerted effort to create sympathy for those who would use terror tactics to defeat the British and American troops currently fighting for Iraqi freedom.

feeds.feedburner.com

sayanythingblog.com

sayanythingblog.com

ace.mu.nu

news.bbc.co.uk

un.org

treasury.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News