International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (13333)	6/24/1997 11:21:00 AM
From: Rock Doctor	of 35569

Nice reply Claude, thanks. I guess I'm thinking (hoping?) that there is a 'happy medium' market response to this PR, i.e.: - yes the market wants BD confirmation (agree) - yes, with NO news yesterday, the price dropped - but perhaps, with the PR today that at least confirms in writing what IPM has only said, this will wake the investment community up a little to IPM's story (face it, the numbers in the PR today are pretty eye-opening, and a PR will circulate to a much wider audience than IPM's AGM statement) - thus the price may steady or even rise accordingly The other points you make are a question of investment style. I respect yours, I'm inherently an all-or-none kind of person who takes (sometimes too many) risks. But I've never felt better about a junior gold than I do about IPM. Best to you, Paul Nicholson

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next