International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: C L who wrote (13440)	6/24/1997 11:33:00 PM
From: Donald Watson, Jr.	of 35569

Just a quick note to all,when I read the press release this morning I was greatly impressed with the numbers from the fire assay. This is huge news on the fire assay alone. The only thing that made me nervous was on Assay number 3 for gold on the Fire Assay section of the press release. My first thought was the blanks under Assay #3 meant dud holes (kind of like what bxmnf announced in their last press release regarding the numbers) After I read it several times I realized the Assays were done "At least twice" This indicated to me that assay Number 3 for holes 161 and PD were NOT assayed a third time (they should have made an asterik there indicating NO ASSAY). Hole 151 indicated 0.35 I just wanted to clarify this in case anyone else thought that they were DUD HOLES. Sorry if this was not an issue, it just confused me for a moment. Peace my friends, Don

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next