SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 386.47-0.2%Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Elroy Jetson10/3/2017 1:46:35 PM
1 Recommendation

Recommended By
gg cox

   of 218231
 
The Supreme Court heard a strong argument Tuesday for reining in partisan gerrymanderinglatimes.com

Justice Anthony Kennedy, an important swing-voter on the Court asked a lawyer for Wisconsin’s Republicans whether it would be constitutional for the state to adopt a law that the election map will be drawn to “favor party X over party Y.”

Attorney Erin Murphy hesitated, noting that in this case, Republicans did not publicly proclaim that they were drawing a statewide map to ensure the GOP would maintain a solid majority, even though that was the effect of the district lines they created.

Kennedy was undeterred. “I’d like an answer to my question,” he said. By the time the hour-long argument ended, it was clear that Kennedy believes that the Constitution would prevent one party from writing a law designed to keep itself in power.

Paul Smith, an attorney for Wisconsin Democrats, who brought the current case, told the justices. “And this is your last opportunity” to act before the next round of redistricting following the census of 2020.

Arnold Schwarzenegger outside Supreme Court: 'Say hasta la vista to gerrymandering'.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext