SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 327.38+1.6%11:11 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (13599)12/18/1997 8:20:00 PM
From: Clarksterh   of 70976
 
Darrell - <<if you have to "fix" the price of dram through an agreement of understanding to where companies can make money producing it, where's the wrong?>>

OK - then how do you decide who gets to sell how many. After all, if the price is fixed artificially high, then they aren't going to sell as many, so their will be vacant plants. Whose? Should it be in proportion? Why should Micron suffer, when it was the Koreans who stuffed the channel by spending without thought?

OR - If you fix the price, what is the incentive to make it newer, better, faster. This is the primary problem with communism. There is no incentive. Or, for another example of how stagnating price fixing is, look at the innovation that has occurred in telephony since AT&T lost their price regulated monopoly. And AT&T has actually grown much faster than it probably otherwise would have.

Price fixing is never a solution except possibly for finite commodities which don't spoil (diamonds, and oil are the two best examples).

Clark
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext