< Johnny is confusing categories when he argues that science is the proper
field for arguing about the existence of God>>
John Galt is not confusing catagories, Jfreddy. Your attempts to evade the
central issue is noted. Know that the proper forum to ESTABLISH the
'existence of anything' is science and not to the exclusion of a 'creator'.
Anything less, of course, must fall to subjective argument no matter the
discipline. Be careful, Jfreddy. Know you place among the Galtians. If
your intent is to 'invent' a new standard of 'evidence' by which
'existance' can be ESTABLISHED in order to 'proove' the existence of a
'creator', and that can be held in equatible regard to science, then you
are late in the game, JFreddy. The Creationists have been around a long
while and they have the audacity to declare themselves scientists! Here,
then, is the central issue, JFreddy. Do not mingle science with mysticism.
Do not smear the good name of science. No your place, Jfreddy, and do not
confuse the central issue.
Know, too, Jfreddy, that it is likely closest you or anyone else can come
to clear 'evidence'
of a 'creator' may be in the interactions upon these very threads with the
Mighty Galt!
John Galt |
