International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ellis Rudman who wrote (1368)	1/13/1997 10:25:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	of 35569

Ellis: We went through that earlier this year during the earlier warrants, and the company engineered then the price rise necessary to "force" conversion and thus raise the money they needed to continue. Are you implying that the recent run up was "engineered" as well for, in essence the same purpose? You are not doubting the reports that the actual assays on the samples taken earlier and assayed at about .044 otp and now at about .3 otp (same samples), even if BD did not sign on these new assays, are you? This management would not do such a thing, or, are you implying that when financial survival is at stake, they could indeed engineer such a rise? Zeev

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next