OK, this is my last post today. Gotta go.
MR. Allen, what gets most of us here frustrated is when we address a specific post with specific responses and then you come back with a broad sweeping comment that does not address the response to your questions. I am at a loss as to your intentions here.
Regarding your questions from your previous post,
"Where are the results?" They are trying to get on a schedule of 2 holes a week with releases every two weeks. (for the new drill program) As far as I can tell, so far we are OK considering we just got a release last week on the first two holes.
" What performance standards are the labs adhering to?" You will have to define that a bit, but I assume you mean a timetable vs. quality of work and the above answers that question.
"Where are the results from labs other than Ledoux?" As I understand it, the multiple labs will be used to confirm and verify the work of Ledoux. This is the overkill Mark has referred to. This will create a test format that NO one can questions as to accuracy.
"What happened to the company option on J/L?" That is an open opportunity as I understand it. If they can come up with consistent results, great. If not, don't come out of the lab and don't bother us.
"Is the company testing the ore with both methods?" Assuming the above is still the case, then the answer must be yes, but on their own time and on their own schedule as to not disrupt the core thrust of the SFA test program.
I don't know if that helps, but that's what I know. Anyone with different info, please chime in.
See you all next week.
Regards,
Tom F. |
