SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TLAB info?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (1376)10/13/1997 8:58:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit   of 7342
 
Chip, for every seller there is a buyer, and while we know that the market makers play games witrh prices, they act as buffers. Were I interested in shorting a stock it would be based on the belief that business would be trending down or the stock was hyped beyond its ability to meet expectations. It would not be based on pseudostatistics. Some argue that TLAB is overpriced because its long-term growth rate is not high enough relative to its eps. I argue that the long term growth rate is poised to expand significantly, and I want to be in it for the long ride up. These kinds of disagreements of interpretation are based on perceptions of the future driven by hard information. What bothers me about market timing is that it is uncorroborated, and unproven. How do you explain the fact that you get 5 T/A "experts" in a room and get 10 different opinions as to what the charts mean? Ultimately, each claims he is right because given enough time the stock moves in the direction he predicted. That simply makes use of the law of large numbers in a stochastic environment.

If you generate some predictions (including the timing) that are statistically different from the null hypothesis I will accept the idea. Until then I remain a skeptic.

Regards,

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext