Gary, thanks for that article which, I note, expresses very similar opinions to those posted on the forum.
Perhaps I'm just bloody-minded or merely cynical but I still do not accept the "official" version. I have seen pictures of many aircrashes into mountains, buildings, other planes, you name it, and in every one there has been clear evidence of wreckage, debris etc and the unambiguous demonstration of what took place. There is nothing like this in the Pentagon "incident". Simply, there is evidence of a fire and the collapse of the building. Indeed, the fire does not appear to be of such intensity as to vaporize metal, including that of both jet engines and even the tail of the airliner which is about one hundred and fifty feet away from the nose.
Of course, if it didn't crash into the Pentagon and then vaporize into thin air, it is a complete mystery as to what happened to Flight 77 and all its occupants. But then, perhaps, we should ask David Copperfield how he makes an aircraft "disappear" in front of the very eyes of onlookers! |
