SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (13887)2/22/2011 10:27:27 PM
From: Jacques Chitte   of 69300
 
Human modernity might be as much as fifty thousand years old or more. We have no way of knowing. Human history is a more restricted category, since it implies human stories that have survived to the present day. Since we don't have any stories that can plausibly be assigned to the time before the ice sheets receded at the end of the last great glaciation (maybe twelve thousand years) ... I'm operating from an educated guess in re the greatest assignable age of the flood story. So suggesting that the mountains might have been significantly different in height and shape such a short time ago is without support from any independent earth scientists.

I understand your central premise about the resurrection miracle being the hinge. Nonetheless the emphasis on the Bible's verity is also an indispensable plank of Christian doctrine. I'm thinking about the flood in a sort of reverse: testing its plausibility from what I know of geology, history and human experience in general. If I find that the Bible won't get the things that I *can* check right to any recognizable degree, my willingness to trust its account of the big things is undercut. Reagan had a marvelously pithy aphorism that I apply to this and some other situations: Trust, but verify.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext