SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jeffbas who wrote (13894)2/12/2002 12:05:40 AM
From: Bob Rudd  Read Replies (1) of 78673
 
jeffrey bash <<if you had read that WSJ article you would not be so comfortable about believing there wasn't massive fraud.>>Actually, I did read it...then assigned massive fraud a 10% probability...a helluva lot higher than baseline, but a lot lower than certainty or 'highly likely'. If recently adjusted estimates of 1.46 are real then a 20 multiple would still be discount to the group. Or they could miss...but not huge, or they could find a cure for Alzhiemers...assigning probabilities to those various outcomes, I get about a 21 to 24 expected value....>50% upside from here. Enron and recent accounting focus has greatly increased perceptions of fraud likelihood the way a big airline crash increases fear of flying [The behavioral finance folks would refer to this as the availability heuristic]. I think this has produced an excessive discounting in companies like TYC, CPN and ELN. OTOH, I'm keeping my bets modest...especailly with ELN.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext