SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Grainne who wrote (13933)4/18/1998 3:24:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) of 20981
 
The concept, as I understand it, is that Starr is already so unpopular he may have little to lose. The charge would be obstruction of justice--I assume for the talking points issue--and he would name Clinton as an unindicted coconspirator. And it could be done only if there is a ruling on the immunity issue that she has none, in regard to the letter Ginzburg says is binding.

I don't doubt he could do it, but I think it'd be really stupid. Monica could easily be charged, and very likely convicted, for subornation of perjury. There appears to be no doubt that she gave the "Talking Points" to Tripp. So she's toast. But it would be very difficult indeed to prove that they came from Clinton. She'd end up in jail, he wouldn't. And that would make Starr look like a major creep.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News