Zenyatta Free Speech Board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board

ZEN 77.48

0.0%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RuddyMongoose who wrote (14009)	12/19/2016 9:18:53 AM
From: the Chief	2 Recommendations Recommended By hoperrs Shoto Read Replies (1) of 22811

Chief, have you ever seen another PEA besides the one from CCB that used 100% Inferred resource data to do an economic analysis of mine viability plus a life of mine estimate? I didn't think so. Nice of you to answer your own question, but you are wrong again. There was more than a few Gold Companies that had gold veining in the Carlin trend in Nevada, and reported an inferred for the same reason we did. Veining is a special animal and does not adhere to the standard 25m spacing between drill holes because it does not reflect the make up of the geology. So in EVERY case of veining if traced back, the likelihood of an inferred PEA if they progressed that far is high. If you knew anything about mining, you would have known that but alas I am discussing this with a novice who really does not understand much about anything. So I guess I should ask you a stupid question considering thats all you ask me. Name one veining property that did not use inferred if progressed to a PEA? I await a long pause and a withdrawl into the hole from whence you came.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next