Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (14213)	10/28/2003 6:58:00 PM
From: Ilaine	of 793897

The "under God" plaintiff is perfectly adequate. Despite the fact that he's not the custodial parent, he's the father of the child, and he thinks she's being injured, even if she doesn't. She's just a child. If she thought it was ok to work in a strip joint, that doesn't mean he has to agree. Further, the time to challenge his standing is long past. I'm fine with the pledge as it is, but if they change it, fine by me, too. When I was in high school, I used to remain silent when it was said, because I thought it was a lie ("with liberty and justice for all.") I outgrew that. My parents wouldn't have let the school officials to force me to say it, but they didn't try.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next