More and more I believe he makes these gaffes because he doesn't have a fundamental understanding about what he is talking.
This is bull and you know it.
On the contrary, starting from his campaign, Bush has shown a very weak understanding of economics. Your icon wasn't exactly an A student.
In case you haven't noticed, the story is reported by Reuters. This is the same liberal news service that chose to quit referring to the 9/11 attackers as "terrorists", with the remark, "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF LIBERAL BIAS IN THE MEDIA.
Reuters. What idiots. The story is totally without credibility. The yen dropped from 132.80 per dollar from 132.55; hardly what I'd call "sending the financial markets wobbling".
If you say so..........
Interestingly, they managed to criticize Reagan (the best speaker of all modern presidents, and arguably the best president), Bush I, and Bush II, in the same article, without once referring to Carter's Playboy Magazine gaff or any of Clinton's absurd remarks.
Get it thru your head, Reagan was a B grade actor who acted his way thru the White House.....no one in CA was fooled, acting is one of their number one exports.
This is the reason we should always be careful to determine the source of a news story before reading it. If it is from Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, or CNN, it is better to skip it and move to a less-biased source (if you can find one).
Paranoia can be a terrible waste of a mind, assuming there is one to waste.
Have a nice day!! |
