SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : $2 or higher gas - Can ethanol make a comeback?
DAR 36.61-0.5%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: richardred who wrote (1426)7/15/2006 3:02:32 PM
From: Think4Yourself  Read Replies (1) of 2801
 
re: "In its January edition, the respected journal Science published a study conducted by researchers at the University of California-Berkeley that concluded producing ethanol from corn uses much less petroleum than producing gasoline."

The key word here is PETROLEUM. This study may in fact be right, but it is totally irrelevant. The claim is that it takes more ENERGY to produce ethanol than ethanol provides. They addressed only part of the issue. It takes a snotload of Natural Gas to make the fertilizer, and to process the ethanol, major facts they somehow managed to ignore.

They broke the other studies "correcting" them with their incompetence. I bet they didn't even compensate for the fact that it takes a lot more ethanol to get the mileage as gasoline. They probably compared the "petroleum" to make 1 gallon of ethanol vs one gallon of gasoline, when it should be more like 1.5 gallons of ethanol vs one gallon of gasoline

A biased and wrong analysis is about the best one can expect from the ethanol special interests. The word "respected" immediately tipped me off I was in for a laugh when I read that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext