SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SE who wrote (14434)2/2/1999 1:04:00 AM
From: nicewatch   of 44573
 
Hi Scott, No problem... you're welcome. I've been pretty busy lately between school and trading... I haven't had that much time to read SI and other "net" stuff. As for MACD (13,34,89) it does delineate the divergences rather well... on all timeframes, from what I can tell. I also like to use the zero line as a trend determinant. Back in the day -about 2 years ago- I did a lot of tradestation programming. For the stuff I was doing at the time... that MACD held up rather well in my testing, FWIW. Since then, it is an indicator I've been plotting and keeping an eye on. Please let me know if you come up with better entry parameters for it... I'd be interested in hearing them. One idea is to apply Bill Williams histogram signals (i.e. "trading chaos" and "new trading dimensions") to the MACD (13,34,89). If I can think of any insights i have regarding MACD(13,34,89) I will let you know. It's one of those things that I have been looking at long enough, that I have to think about it a bit, before I try to -reasonably- explain how I use it to others. <G> The same goes for the MAC (moving average channel) method, which combines well -for me- with the MACD. Of course, I am fond of the fork too. Talk to you later Regards, Frank
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext