Tejek Re.. I believe in and support the right of any disenfranchised group to live in peace and freedom.<<<<<<<
Then you obviously must have been in favor of the South winning the civil war, or in favor of Hitler's claim that the oppression of the treaties from WWI justified WWII. You must also distinguish between the right to living in peace (unless you consider suicide bombers your version of living in peace), and waging war trying to get your version of peace. Make no mistake, Palestine has declared war upon Israel. Instead of shooting guns, firing rockets or bombing with an airplane, Palestine is using suicide bombers. They are bombers none the less, and your attempt to glorify them doesn't change that fact. Certainly, the people of Germany felt justified in bombing London, and its civilians, but it was an act of war none the less. This is also an act of war and should be treated as such. Does country A, have a right to attack another country B, if country B is harboring terrorists. Actually, there is ample evidence that the answer is yes. In fact, Canada once attacked the US in a raid to stop terrorists. The US attacked Mexico when I believe Pancho Via attacked New Mexico and fled across the border. And of course, the US attacked Afghanistan. Any country has the obligation to control its citizens, and its borders, and if it can't, be subject to attack, and pay for damages. In other words, if a person attacks from your country, or runs into your country to avoid prosecution, your country has the obligation to arrest them, or be considered in conclusion. Palestine has refused to arrest the leaders of the bombers, and is waging war on Israel. Why do you say they are trying to live in peace. |
