SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis- Indicators & Systems

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gonzongo who wrote (1452)6/12/1997 1:02:00 AM
From: TechTrader42   of 3325
 
Thanks, Andy. Here, by the way, is my simplest version of the translation of Claud's formula into WOW's language:

((fml("A"))-
(llv(fml("A"),20))/(hhv(fml("A"),20))-
(llv(fml("A"),20))
+.001)*100

where Formula A = 4 * Std(C,20)/Mov(C,20,S)

But it's not right. It makes a line, but not the one intended, I'm sure. And the .001 in it is virtually meaningless. So what Claud's formula really amounts to, I still don't know: The real mystery is what is divided into what. And I've tried every possible combination, and analyzed the placement of every parenthesis, but nothing seems to work, and the .001 remains meaningless.

Here's his:

((4*(Std(C,20))/Mov(C,20,S))-
Lowest(4*(Std(C,20))/Mov(C,20,S)))/
(Highest(4*(Std(C,20))/
Mov(C,20,S))-Lowest(4*(Std(C,20))/
Mov(C,20,S))+.001)*100

Would anyone with Metastock mind sending me a chart with a picture of the line that this baffling formula generates? I even tried the Rosetta Stone this time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext