Paul with regard to my comment about suing you, I hope you and all other readers realize that my comment was made tongue-in-cheek :!) in order to make the converse point I originally made in #1442 by way of disagreeing with Richard. I am glad you have found out exactly how release of information at conferences is handled. I knew it could be done easily enough without facing life in jail. I do not really intend to sue you unless the threat will get you to go back to once again offerring to take us on the trip with you as well as providing free dinner <grin>.
PRLN is, in fact, already too much of a well kept secret and I, myself, have been under the impression we had some investment in getting the secret out. Richard seems to want to assure it is kept under wraps for good! This is not a good way to increase the share value, I think!
Richard, if you really want to get worked up over secrecy read about the real secrecy problem, which is the story of the secrets that are kept--about dangerous cars, medications, hospital procedures, savings and loans procedures, food processing procedures, insurance fraud procedures--by corporations and power lawyers--as told in No Contest by Nader and Smith. Therein is the story of great abuse--in secrecy kept--if you will.
Larry |
