SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1462989)6/16/2024 4:10:32 AM
From: maceng22 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
Maple MAGA

  Read Replies (1) of 1572121
 
I watched that prof Greg guy first. Wondered if he had anything relevant to say, and truly wondered what his motivation was? I am a bit slow buy finally realised what he was about. Dr John Campbell has made him look like a total idiot, which unfortunately he is. A sad case I am afraid.

Being wrong is one thing. Being able to see your wrong and making good is the cornerstone of professionalism and being a good scientist, statistician, medical practitioner, what have you.

An interesting case is Dr John Campbell. A real professional who trains nurses. Ego is a luxury that cannot be afforded in such a position. When the vaccine first came out Dr John Campbell did question things a bit but took the first two does of the "vaxxine". That was the protocol he followed and what was expected of him in his position. I personally thought he was wrong and just bowing to the authority he normally worked under. He was being a responsible leader I suppose. You don't train nurses to question and re evaluate everything they are taught.

He was wrong though on the matter of the "Vaxxine" and had the strength of character to admit he was wrong and make the necessary adjustments. Everything he has said since is self explanatory.

So even the best of us can be made to look like an idiot. The difference being a genuine researcher realizes they are a fault and adjusts, while total idiots like prof Greg go into permanent denial. They just cannot handle being wrong, especially in front of a large social media audience. That is were he is at in the video you posted. He gets "offended", the real reason being of course he has been shown to be wrong. He resorts to an act, looking and sounding like the ever so serious "scientist" but unfortunately just talks mumbo jumbo or plain lies. It's pathetic frankly. If prof Greg was a real statistician, where you are trained to critically evaluate the the authenticity of the data, where is his review of the crappy and useless PCR test ? and where is his review of the opiate and midazolam debacle??

Critical review... not what is hopefully thought to be maybe right, and that fits the data.

I would like to mention here, again, that Dr John Campbell is a trainer of nurses. He knows the ins and outs of when such drugs are to be used, and how to use them. He goes into the details. A really knowledgeable person, while prof greg is clueless.



As regarding Dr Susan Oliver, ditto in spades. Just like a lot of low grade populist social media doctors who have tried to cash in on government lead bull chit. They are wrong and now totally embarrassed. They just don't have the depth of character or professionalism to do a proper job.

Her dog is a better scientist.

Really.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext