SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lurqer who wrote (14626)3/14/2003 11:48:06 PM
From: lurqer   of 89467
 
weekend reading

While there is much to like in this article - particularly the "Waterfall Indicator", I had a problem with

History plainly teaches that until the US equity markets are undervalued, any chance of a long-term secular bull once again emerging is purely wishful thinking.

It's not so much that this statement is wrong, as misleading. Actually, what history teaches is that for a long-term secular bull to begin, undervaluation is a necessary, but insufficient condition. For the secular bear that began in '29, the P/E compression plunge ended in '32. On an inflation adjusted basis, the next secular bull began in '49. For the secular bear that began in '66, the P/E compression plunge ended in '74; the next secular bull began in '82. Clearly, something else besides valuation is required for the emergence of a new secular bull. I believe the sufficient condition is demographic spending. On this basis, I see (using my three-D model)



Delusion Despair Disgust
'29 '32 '49
'66 '74 '82
'00 '07/'08 '18



lurqer
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext