SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: koan6/28/2006 3:14:08 PM
  Read Replies (6) of 78417
 
Scroll down for article: Scientists give 5 stars to Gore's movie!

Well, I wonder if this will convince the doubting Thomases? It is interesting how this became a political issue with the conservative's, generally taking the position global warming is not real. How did that happen? Should it not be a matter of pure science and not politics?

Gore says we have 10 years to sort this out. Only a 10 degree rise in temperature during the Permian age 290 million years ago wiped out 95% of all the life on earth. They theorize the melting of methane hydrates (they turn to gas at room tmeperature) was part of the cause. Methane is 20 times more heat reflective than carbon dioxide. The permafrost that runs around the artic has a lot of frozen methane and at the bottom of the ocean.

I also remember Claude Cornier was not convinced about global warming caused by man. Does this change your mind Claude?

Scientists OK Gore's movie for accuracy By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
Tue Jun 27, 9:15 PM ET


WASHINGTON - The nation's top climate scientists are giving "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore's documentary on global warming, five stars for accuracy.

ADVERTISEMENT

The former vice president's movie — replete with the prospect of a flooded New York City, an inundated Florida, more and nastier hurricanes, worsening droughts, retreating glaciers and disappearing ice sheets — mostly got the science right, said all 19 climate scientists who had seen the movie or read the book and answered questions from The Associated Press.

The AP contacted more than 100 top climate researchers by e-mail and phone for their opinion. Among those contacted were vocal skeptics of climate change theory. Most scientists had not seen the movie, which is in limited release, or read the book.

But those who have seen it had the same general impression: Gore conveyed the science correctly; the world is getting hotter and it is a manmade catastrophe-in-the-making caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

"Excellent," said William Schlesinger, dean of the Nicholas School of Environment and Earth Sciences at Duke University. "He got all the important material and got it right."

Robert Corell, chairman of the worldwide Arctic Climate Impact Assessment group of scientists, read the book and saw Gore give the slideshow presentation that is woven throughout the documentary.

"I sat there and I'm amazed at how thorough and accurate," Corell said. "After the presentation I said, `Al, I'm absolutely blown away. There's a lot of details you could get wrong.' ... I could find no error."

Gore, in an interview with the AP, said he wasn't surprised "because I took a lot of care to try to make sure the science was right."

The tiny errors scientists found weren't a big deal, "far, far fewer and less significant than the shortcoming in speeches by the typical politician explaining an issue," said Michael MacCracken, who used to be in charge of the nation's global warming effects program and is now chief scientist at the Climate Institute in Washington.

One concern was about the connection between hurricanes and global warming. That is a subject of a heated debate in the science community. Gore cited five recent scientific studies to support his view.

"I thought the use of imagery from Hurricane Katrina was inappropriate and unnecessary in this regard, as there are plenty of disturbing impacts associated with global warming for which there is much greater scientific consensus," said Brian Soden, a University of Miami professor of meteorology and oceanography.

Some scientists said Gore confused his ice sheets when he said the effect of the Clean Air Act is noticeable in the Antarctic ice core; it is the Greenland ice core. Others thought Gore oversimplified the causal-link between the key greenhouse gas carbon dioxide and rising temperatures.

While some nonscientists could be depressed by the dire disaster-laden warmer world scenario that Gore laid out, one top researcher thought it was too optimistic. Tom Wigley, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, thought the former vice president sugarcoated the problem by saying that with already-available technologies and changes in habit — such as changing light bulbs — the world could help slow or stop global warming.

While more than 1 million people have seen the movie since it opened in May, that does not include Washington's top science decision makers. President Bush said he won't see it. The heads of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA haven't seen it, and the president's science adviser said the movie is on his to-see list.

"They are quite literally afraid to know the truth," Gore said. "Because if you accept the truth of what the scientific community is saying, it gives you a moral imperative to start to rein in the 70 million tons of global warming pollution that human civilization is putting into the atmosphere every day."

As far as the movie's entertainment value, Scripps Institution geosciences professor Jeff Severinghaus summed it up: "My wife fell asleep. Of course, I was on the edge of my chair."

___

On the Net: climatecrisis.net

Email Story IM Story Discuss Printable View RECOMMEND THIS STORY
Recommend It:

Average (269 votes)
» Recommended Stories
Full Coverage: Climate Change
Off the Wires
Kyoto Protocol: Germany under fire for carbon pollution give-away AFP, Wed Jun 28, 11:19 AM ET Scientists OK Gore's movie for accuracy AP, Tue Jun 27, 9:15 PM ET Feature Articles
How to Cool a Planet (Maybe) at The New York Times (reg. req'd), Jun 27 Al Gore on failure, catastrophe, and a business model for avoiding the complete and total ruination of Earth at New Haven Advocate, Jun 22 News Stories
Pollution in Overdrive at The Washington Post (reg. req'd), Jun 28 High court to hear 'greenhouse' case at Christian Science Monitor, Jun 27 Opinion & Editorials
Al Gore and the Global Warming Scare at Human Events Online, Jun 22 'Inconvenient Truth' is grim and startling at Statesman Journal, Jun 22
Science News
Archeologists unveil pharaonic tomb AP Tropical Stonehenge may have been found AP Clouds threaten Saturday shuttle launch AP China shows off secretive space program AP Scientists OK Gore's movie for accuracy AP Most Viewed - Science
Archeologists unveil pharaonic tomb AP Tropical Stonehenge may have been found AP Huge Asteroid to Fly Past Earth July 3 SPACE.com / LiveScience.com Scientists OK Gore's movie for accuracy AP How is dingo urine gathered? Carefully, study says Reuters
AP Photo: In a file photo former Vice President Al Gore makes talks to the media as...
Slideshow: Climate Change Issues
RELATED
Al Gore Q&A Yahoo! Movies
'An Inconvenient Truth' movie page Yahoo! Movies
Add headlines to your personalized My Yahoo! page
(About My Yahoo! and RSS)
Science - Environment

Climate Change

» More News Feeds
NEWS ALERTS

Get an alert when there are new stories about:


Al Gore
President Bush
Environmental Protection Agency
NASA

» More Alerts


Elsewhere on the Web
CNN.com
Group: Sonar used in Navy exercise may kill whales
CNN.com
NASA hopes foam fixes solve problem
USATODAY.com
Astronauts running out of space on cluttered station


ASSIGNMENT EARTH

Planet Profiled
Explore the world's wonders and the battle to save them.

MOST POPULAR

Popular Science
The most popular science news stories and photos.

» All Most Popular
YAHOO! SEARCH
More News in Yahoo! Search
Premium subscription news content now in Yahoo! Search.

» Learn More
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext