PYNG Technologies Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Patrick who wrote (1440)	3/24/1998 12:59:00 PM
From: Bernard Elbaum	of 8117

M. Jacobs did post on this thread in Dec. or Jan. as I remember that he was in contact with larger firms that could be potential collaborators with Pyng. If you find one of his more recent posts, and search his personal profile, you should find the post in question. There is no question that Pyng, with its currently tiny organization, would benefit from a joint arrangement with a big firm that has marketing and distribution clout. Pyng does potentially have an unusual ace in the hole, however--the FAST1 is desiged to be a backup procedure in emergency life or death cases where there are no good alternatives. If the fieldwork trials give the FAST1 a sufficiently favorable review, experts in emergency medicine may go so far as to recommend it as a standard backup procedureto the IV. Providers who lack the FAST1 may then be liable to lawsuit. To clear up some confusion, if you read the PYNG web site, you should understand that the FAST1 will have no sizable impact on the market share of IV devices. The FAST1 is designed for the estimated 500,000 cases per year in the US where patients are taken by ambulance without an IV because it proved too difficult to administer.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next