SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 37.81-4.3%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maui_dude who wrote (146898)11/6/2001 12:00:04 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
I would appreciate some insight from a 'process' guy/girl on why AMD is able to do the hybrid process and Intel is not (or has not) ? If Intel were able to do that, wouldn't that have prevented the performance crown AMD got last year (briefly) with Athlon ?

Not a process expert here but I do know something about manufacturing. I think it's a mistake to think Intel hasn't done this in the past. Perhaps I shouldn't say any more then just that the 1GHz P3s were not running on the same exact process as other versions. Intel is not in that position anymore. AMD is the desperate one. P4 is at 2GHz on the very first version with minimal cache and optimizations. Compare that to the original K7. Athlon is now on it's third version. How much better does Athlon perform clock for clock compared to the original? Northwood is near release and Intel just doesn't need to take desperate measures to remain competitive.

Regarding .09u gates, I think there will need to be a new generation of equipment to achieve this.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext