Winspear Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sudhir Khanna who wrote (14893)	2/18/1999 3:07:00 PM
From: John Paquet	of 26850

Hi! Sudhir; I was preparpring 3-4 pages argument to be posting on the weekend regarding your RESOURCES INDICATOR...... sINCE your last posts proves that you have improved so I guess I do not need to then.... The format I set it out as follows; AS a RESOURCES iNDICATOR IT SHOULD LAYOUT LIKE THIS: 1. RESOURCES VERY BULLISH INDICATOR THEN... 2. RESOURCES BULLISH INDICATOR THEN REASONS OR 3. RESOURCES NEUTRAL INDICATOR THEN ASSESMENT 4. RESOURCES BEARISH INDICATOR THEN RATIONAL 5. RESOURCES VERY BEARISH INDICATOR THEN ... At any time, If I am a newsletter writer, I would not give one specific CATEGORY AS CLASSIFIED AS ABOVE 5 CATEGORIES UNLESS i AM FOR SURE 100% SURE, but since the only one would know for sure is "God", if I ASSUME OR i TAKE IT FOR GRANTED FOR ONE SPECIFIC category, then I will undertake greater risk and or my career reputation as a newsletter writer could undertake a great damage if I was wrong. I read many jounalists their writing always lay out like above 5 category or 3 catategories. Every categories the jounalist would give reasons, rationals, assesment or quoting someone's assesment, therefor the jounalists have avoid any risk or reputation as a good jounalist. Anyway this is just my thought. John Paquet

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next