SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (149844)12/12/2008 3:50:54 PM
From: one_less   of 173976
 
The argument is getting messy so lets try to clarify and focus some points you are logging.

1) Marriage is a basic civil right of man.
2) You've alleged denial of this right to gays is discrimination.
3) Also allegations that denial of this right is persecution.
4) This marriage right should be extended to same sexes as a basic right.
5) Marriage has historically been defined as a heterosexual union.

You have used the Surpreme Court to establish the context of marriage as a basic civil right.

There is a religious tangent that you and Brumar are traveling.

You have tried unsuccessfully to show discrimination and persecution as a justification for changing the definition.

You continue to argue the extended definition but you have no way to explain why or how such a definition is rightfully extended to gays when there are other human beings living some alternative life style, or desiring to do so that would not be included in this basic right.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News