SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 37.81-4.3%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (151224)12/5/2001 5:26:12 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
bmw
that was the problem, not the proof
1.5 * sum = sum, that may be a true statement depending on definition of "="
the other interpretation is
sum/(1.5*sum) = 1/1.5
sum= limit (a->q=1.5, x-> inf) [ a * (1-q^(x+1))/(1-q) ]
1.5 * sum = limit (a->q=1.5, x-> inf) [1.5*a*(1-q^(x+1))/(1-q)]

both you and Ten are right even though that your results contradict each other, I think, so even math is open to interpretation :-))

Regards
-Albert

ps equation is actually equally defined to 0/0, we consider "orders of infinity"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News