At a bottom now for gold? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : At a bottom now for gold?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ahhaha who wrote (1519)	8/7/1998 10:22:00 AM
From: Ahda	of 1911

All We have mergers which end up becoming monopoly on products you take synergy to reduce costs and that eventually will lead to higher costs public wise. You look at Asia and to part of her problem is inner competition transparency a problem and competition just eats at itself for survival. Asia is not unified we create high tech they compete with self to produce what we have envisioned and stretch this to far where competition exceeded demand which it appears to be our demand Currency crisis yet i have often viewed that as only external problems i sitll do. Hawaii facing problems because of tourism so will be not as many travelling from Asia. Canada to US can't afford to on the other hand others are thinking US Asia,Canada can afford to. If one continues like this for very long the high valued dollar has to become less valued. Just amounts to the stongest pricing themselves out of the publics reach as the public reaches elsewhere. Or does this not make sense as by the continuation of manufacturing policies in Asia and China that are beating the bottom line with each other labor wise and currency wise. The internal problems here are what the problem is. It is one thing to have companies in compete internally another global darn difficult to sell your products to such mass audience the net work has to be fantastic as well as the politcal arena. Perhaps i am way to simplistic but mega mergers created problems so down sizing took place because control could not be had. Here you have a mega market in the making everbody producing like at lower dollar and selling external. Just seems to me those that survive this are going to have carte blanche even better becuase what is to costly isn't going to be bought but made. What an opportunity for Asia if she wasn't at her own throat. Where am i wrong other than the time factor being long range. Scuse typing

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next