Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (152121)	12/21/2005 12:07:01 PM
From: KLP	of 793914

No, I didn't mean "new" to America. I meant, you are new to this site, Politics for Pros. You certainly don't have to follow my suggestion, but it might be wise. Re the WMD...AS you well know, WMD wasn't the only reason to go into Iraq. See the White House site for all the actual documents and the wording if you dispute that. The MSM and many leftwing people and sites would like you and I to believe that it was. But yes, many including me, were "naive enough" to believe there was WMD of all sorts in Iraq at the time we went in....Saddam probably did send much to Syria, as we noted by those long convoys of trucks that were seen and photographed leaving Baghdad before the war. The thing I really wonder about is: If Saddam and group could bury completely in the sands MANY jet airplanes (we all saw the pictures, and I think we can still find the pictures of the operation to unbury the planes), is any one naive enough NOT to believe that Saddam could bury a few barrels, or even hundreds of barrels of chemicals, or bio weapons in those same sands? Edit: Here's a picture of one of them: newsmax.com This article and pictures are interesting as well... truthorfiction.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next