SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Doug R9/10/2006 10:34:40 PM
   of 20039
 
Good animated graphic of where the planes were and, more importantly, when they performed certain actions.

Note that when a transponder on one plane is shut down, another is, at that moment, taking off.
Note the crossing of paths at times when other events also occur.
The point of the graphic is to show that the planes followed a precise plan that is military in its precision. The 9/11 Omission Report doesn't address this. The alleged hijackers...some of whom have turned up alive and some of whom were basket cases unable to fly a Cessna are supposedly flying the way the US military practices procedures.

team8plus.org

This type of activity does fit well with Tarpley's assertion that 9/11 was a military takeover of the government.
If so, I'd say it was likely at the urging, or under the direction, of monied interests who had lost "product" from Afghanistan as well as those who were being "charged" too much by the Taliban to put a pipeline through the country.

It's known that a pipeline through Afghanistan was being sought. Negotiations were under way and Taliban representatives had been visiting the US and talking to the bush administration fairly regularly early on. Unocal was instrumental in bringing Taliban representatives over.
A partial deal may have been struck. It's known that the Taliban was given some 10s of millions of dollars at one point.
The Taliban may have stiffed the companies (Halliburton, Unocal, Bechtel not to be ignored here) involved with the pipeline and upped the ante....wanting a bigger cut of the pipeline action.
The US probably threatened the Taliban at this point and the Taliban's response was to destroy the opium crop as a preemptive economic strike at.
That REALLY pissed off the banks. When a BIG heroin dealer needs to launder drug profits, he probably gets much less than 50 cents on the dollar...the banks get the rest. Billions and billions...every year. That's a lot of income taken from banking interests.
We know that plans to attack Afghanistan were already drawn up and sitting on bush's desk before 9/11.
The banks...many run by former cold-war cia, dia, nsa, etc old guys, using their connections in covert military, would have led the coup by getting the drills set up that Tarpley outlines very well and then flipping them live.

This theory actually lets bush off the hook and explains his behavior at the school and why he landed at the two military bases he did before going back to Washington. Maybe he didn't want to or was seen as incapable of directing other resources toward the problems with the Taliban which left only the military option. It also explains much more than other theses.

The bushies should opt for the Tarpley scenario.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext