OK. This has now become obnoxious enough (Dr. Meade's incessant Rah-rah-rahing) to annoy me.
Dr. Meade: Your irrational exuberance is too much. (Definition of rational, according to Webster's: "Relating to, based on, or agreeable to reason" ["Reason": A sufficient ground of explanation or of logical defense, especially something (as a principle or law) that supports a conclusion or explains a fact].
You have no tangible evidence for your claims. I'm not even talking about David's "$3.00 by March" reminders. I don't care if you were off in this projection.
What bothers me is 1) how far you were off and, more importantly, 2) the reasons you were off. You keep citing sure things (BIG news releases) that don't materialize. This is irresponsible at best, and criminal at worst (Depending on your motives and remuneration for doing so).
I'd like to think that you've simply been foolish on this one, but your insistent hyping of this stock (in the face of all reason) is mind-boggling (At least, it is to my little mind).
It has also started to become aggravating. Wait until the stock scrapes above $0.04 before you even think about calling it a "Must buy!" And even then, I would be careful.
Your credibility is in the toilet right now. I think I believed you at one point in the distant past. I will not make that mistake again. Belief is an expectation for the future that is founded in the past. Your past leaves me no reason to even bother reading your posts anymore.
You're free to post, of course. I just ask you to be more thoughtful and more careful about what you post.
Rhino |
