SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (15318)11/6/2005 10:52:40 AM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Not That They'll Listen . . .

posted by Carol Platt Liebau

For a long time, most Democratic war cries have been based on lies: "Republicans hate minorities." "Republicans hate poor people." "Republicans hate women." "It was just about sex." And the list goes on.

As pernicious as those charges are, they're nothing to the newest lie: That somehow, the Bush administration manipulated and manufactured intelligence to justify going to war with Iraq. This lie, in particular, is as scary as it's misguided -- because its ultimate aim is to drive support for the war on terror so low that we lose it. Just like Vietnam.

Some opponents of the war have gone so far 'round the bend that they aren't capable of listening to reason. But just in case there are a few who will, here is a must read piece from The Wall Street Journal.

And here are some of its most important points:


• In July 2004, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan 500-page report that found numerous failures of intelligence gathering and analysis. As for the Bush Administration's role,
    "The Committee did not find any evidence that 
Administration officials attempted to coerce, influence
or pressure analysts to change their judgments related to
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction," (our emphasis).

• The Butler Report, published by the British in July 2004, similarly found no evidence of "deliberate distortion," although it too found much to criticize in the quality of prewar intelligence.

• The March 2005 Robb-Silberman report on WMD intelligence was equally categorical, finding
    "no evidence of political pressure to influence the 
Intelligence Community's pre-war assessments of Iraq's
weapons programs. . . .analysts universally asserted that
in no instance did political pressure cause them to skew
or alter any of their analytical judgments. We conclude
that it was the paucity of intelligence and poor
analytical tradecraft, rather than political pressure,
that produced the inaccurate pre-war intelligence
assessments."

• Finally, last Friday, there was Mr. Fitzgerald:
    "This indictment's not about the propriety of the war, 
and people who believe fervently in the war effort,
people who oppose it, people who are--have mixed feelings
about it should not look to this indictment for any
resolution of how they feel or any vindication of how
they feel."

This won't matter to those who are far gone into the fever swamps of paranoia. But for the rest of us -- and for the press, which keeps reporting even the most outlandish charges as if they had a shred of credibility -- the facts should matter.


carolliebau.blogspot.com

opinionjournal.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext